Evaluation and proof of value
Build a defensible coding-agent orchestration pilot
A pilot should test a defined workflow, environment and control model—not promise a productivity outcome. Keep the baseline, constraints, exceptions and evidence visible so buyers can decide what changed.
| Measure | How to define it | Evidence to retain |
|---|---|---|
| Scope completion | Requirements accepted, changed, or rejected | Requirement ledger and approval record |
| Validation | Checks required and their resulting status | Command output and environment reference |
| Review effort | Reviewer time and requested changes | Pull request and review record |
| Operating cost | Model, worker, and human review inputs | Run budget and recorded cost inputs |
| Exceptions | Policy, access, or workflow deviations | Audit events and decision owner |
This is an evaluation framework, not benchmark data. Measurement definitions and a baseline must be approved by the evaluating organization.
Enter your own baseline values. This worksheet does not assume an improvement rate, price, savings, or customer result.
What does a pilot include?
A bounded workflow, known repositories or sample environment, explicit requirements, validation gates, a human approval path, and a scorecard agreed before the run.
What does it not prove?
One pilot does not substantiate a general productivity, security, cost, or reliability claim. Its limitations and exceptions should be recorded.
How is success measured?
Compare the agreed baseline and scorecard evidence, then review the results with the people responsible for engineering, platform, and risk.
Choose an evaluation path
The initial release is self-hosted. You can also register interest in future Cloud or Enterprise offerings without creating a service commitment.
