Operate in a regulated development environment
Apply defined identity, access, validation, retention, and approval controls without treating tooling as certification.
What does this governed workflow workflow cover?
Apply defined identity, access, validation, retention, and approval controls without treating tooling as certification.
What should an evaluator inspect?
Inspect the stated requirements, workspace boundary, validation evidence, approval points, and stated deployment scope rather than inferring results from an example workflow.
Is this customer proof?
No. Workflow pages describe an evaluation model and may use fictional product artifacts. They do not assert customer adoption, outcome, or availability evidence.
Can we run this workflow today?
A released self-managed artifact and tested quickstart are not published. Review the self-hosted requirements or register interest in future Cloud or Enterprise offerings.
What is the next step?
Use the ungated sample run and pilot scorecard to frame the evaluation, then choose a request path only if the operating model fits.
Starting condition and desired outcome
A change must follow documented controls and produce attributable evidence. The outcome is a run record mapped to your control procedure; BranchRunner does not itself make the deployment compliant or certified.
The current manual workflow
The BranchRunner workflow
- 01Map the procedure
Translate your approved control procedure into roles, checks, approvals, and retention needs.
- 02Enforce the boundary
Run with named identity, minimum access, and an isolated workspace.
- 03Collect evidence
Attach validation, findings, exceptions, and decisions as the run progresses.
- 04Export and retain
Approve delivery and export evidence to the system of record under your policy.
Evidence produced
The run keeps claims separate from checks and decisions. The evidence below describes the record, not a guaranteed outcome.
Product example. Repository, checks, and identities are illustrative; configure them for your system.
Where a person stays in control
Your organization defines and approves the procedure.
Role and approval mapping reflects your identity policy.
Failed checks and overrides require attributable decisions.
Evidence export and deletion follow your documented schedule.
What the workflow can produce
Integrations, deployment, and edition fit
Validate the workflow against one real repository
Bring the starting condition, required checks, and approval boundaries. We will identify what can be configured today and what remains deployment work.
